Search results

...ath>t</math> days. It can be particularly useful in order to measure early engagement (when <math>t</math> is measured from account creation) or during a certain ...n based on the editor class of interest. For example, previous analysis on editor activity showed that extremely active editors with a lifetime average activ ...

* Which readers (in geographic regions/ language, by their engagement -how much they read?) read this article? * How does the presentation of per-user value-added measurements affect editor behavior? ...

| name = Surviving new editor | measures = [[R:Editor retention|Editor retention]] ...

[[Category:Editor engagement experiments]] ...

...Foundation to measure the impact of [[editor engagement experiments|editor engagement projects]]. ...d for reporting purposes (for example: ''over the last month the '''active editor''' population increased by 3%''), as the target of an experiment (for examp ...

...f the English Wikipedia, part of the [[mw:New_Editor_Engagement|New Editor Engagement]] initiative. This document gives details about an experiment we are runnin ...audience of people interested in the [[mw:new editor engagement|new editor engagement initiative]]. However, some background knowledge in basic statistics ([[en: ...

...say "session" we mean a period of time in which a user - be they reader or editor - is browsing our sites and performing actions. Those actions can be clicki With accurate session identification, a host of metrics for measuring user engagement with Wikimedia sites become available to us, which are described below in m ...

...rved in desktop or mobile experiments; compare to [[Research:Mobile editor engagement/Calls to action#1 edit in 24 hours|new mobile editors]], another successful ...oup as a whole, they were slightly less likely to be [[Research:Productive editor|productive editors]] than the control group. This result demonstrates one o ...

...oodBar is a tool designed as part of [[mw:New Editor Engagement|new editor engagement initiative]] to encourage feedback from new users. We found that: MoodBar has been designed as an engagement feature to encourage feedback from new users. The rationale for this featur ...

...ment message until after completing their first edit. Therefore, for each editor included in the experiment the first contribution was omitted. The bytes added are computed in four ways for each editor: ...

...ment message until after completing their first edit. Therefore, for each editor included in the experiment the first contribution was omitted. The distribution of edits per editor in the sample is skewed, the [[:en:box plot|box plot]] in the figure above ...

...w new registered users use [[mw:MoodBar|MoodBar]]. MoodBar is a new editor engagement feature allowing new registered users to report their mood. Users can choos ...patterns, but simply to estimate how long it takes for a newly-registered editor to start using MoodBar. ...

...-continue-to-be-men/|title=Nine out of ten Wikipedians continue to be men: Editor Survey – Wikimedia Blog|website=blog.wikimedia.org}}</ref> A study of 2013 ...years, as shown in Figure 3. The earliest peak in the number of the active editor is found in April 2006. At the end of March 2006, a small group consisting ...

...-continue-to-be-men/|title=Nine out of ten Wikipedians continue to be men: Editor Survey – Wikimedia Blog|website=blog.wikimedia.org}}</ref> A study of 2013 ...years, as shown in Figure 3. The earliest peak in the number of the active editor is found in April 2006. At the end of March 2006, a small group consisting ...

...-continue-to-be-men/|title=Nine out of ten Wikipedians continue to be men: Editor Survey – Wikimedia Blog|website=blog.wikimedia.org}}</ref> A study of 2013 ...years, as shown in Figure 3. The earliest peak in the number of the active editor is found in April 2006. At the end of March 2006, a small group consisting ...

...-continue-to-be-men/|title=Nine out of ten Wikipedians continue to be men: Editor Survey – Wikimedia Blog|website=blog.wikimedia.org}}</ref> A study of 2013 ...years, as shown in Figure 3. The earliest peak in the number of the active editor is found in April 2006. At the end of March 2006, a small group consisting ...

...-continue-to-be-men/|title=Nine out of ten Wikipedians continue to be men: Editor Survey – Wikimedia Blog|website=blog.wikimedia.org}}</ref> A study of 2013 ...years, as shown in Figure 3. The earliest peak in the number of the active editor is found in April 2006. At the end of March 2006, a small group consisting ...

...-continue-to-be-men/|title=Nine out of ten Wikipedians continue to be men: Editor Survey – Wikimedia Blog|website=blog.wikimedia.org}}</ref> A study of 2013 ...years, as shown in Figure 3. The earliest peak in the number of the active editor is found in April 2006. At the end of March 2006, a small group consisting ...

...-continue-to-be-men/|title=Nine out of ten Wikipedians continue to be men: Editor Survey – Wikimedia Blog|website=blog.wikimedia.org}}</ref></> A study of 20 ...years, as shown in Figure 3. The earliest peak in the number of the active editor is found in April 2006. At the end of March 2006, a small group consisting ...

...-continue-to-be-men/|title=Nine out of ten Wikipedians continue to be men: Editor Survey – Wikimedia Blog|website=blog.wikimedia.org}}</ref> A study of 2013 ...years, as shown in Figure 3. The earliest peak in the number of the active editor is found in April 2006. At the end of March 2006, a small group consisting ...