Steward requests/Checkuser/2024-05/B

珍妮111@zh.wikipedia

Template:CU request Template:Quote The account patterns are very similar.. Although they are on the same ISP, this alone does not indicate a strong connection; I have no choice but to declare this. --Sotiale (talk) 11:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Де Спор България@bg.wikipedia

Template:CU request Template:Quote I couldn't find any other accounts, and I can't confirm whether they are the user you suggested because I don't have any previous data. --Sotiale (talk) 12:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Oh, my mistake, sorry about that. I thought that pointing the discussion link (bg:Уикипедия:Разследвания на марионетки/Де Спор България) where the puppeteer account and all of the socks were mentioned would've helped somehow. I'll add the puppeteer account next time that I'm making a request here. Anyway, after making this request I've found further evidence of sockpuppetry. Your confirmation just solidified that. Thanks again! Ted Masters (talk) 12:53, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Eldoradoo1@bs.wikipedia

Template:CU request Template:Quote From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 09:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Shadiaoshuai@zh.wikipedia

Template:CU request Template:Quote --Sotiale (talk) 13:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Dnaimfz@zh.wikipedia

They are already blocked as indefinite with TP block. --Sotiale (talk) 13:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Is it possible to look for sleepers within that IP band? Thanks. $\int$（☎） 13:15, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

I have just updated the request with another user name provided by another clerk Template:Ping. $\int$（☎） 13:17, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Since you've already found IPs similar to their behavior, I'm guessing you've already found the suspicious account if they have one. I think the only thing left is an explanation of what they are similar to and if there are any doubts. --Sotiale (talk) 13:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Well, I believe it's more about looking for account sleepers within that range, not the IP itself. New evidence of Zupspim (zh:Special:diff/82759276) suggests that it is an abuser who holds multiple banned accounts, and therefore the sleeper check was endorsed. $\int$（☎） 22:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Template:Quote --Sotiale (talk) 14:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)