Steward requests/Checkuser/2024-09

Requests

Бмхүн@zh.wikipedia

en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/БмхүнThis is an addendum: Due to his use of a VPN and cross-wiki activity on both accounts, I suspect that he is not solely engaging in similar behavior on zh.wikipedia.org. However, the data on en.wikipedia.org might have already expired.--Rastinition (talk) 02:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Template:Likely from a technical point of view. EPIC (talk) 03:28, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Template:Ping Based on the CU result and given Бмхүн has been blocked in he.wiki and commons as well, would it be possible to lock all socks that were confirmed (based on xwiki abuse)? $\int$（☎） 09:28, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Template:Done EPIC (talk) 11:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Vaportrap@plwikibooks

Technically Template:Likely. Although not enough for me to call it confirmed from a technical POV, at least not at plwikibooks, with the combined behavorial POV I think it's safe to say it's them, so locked accordingly. EPIC (talk) 14:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Бмхүн@zh.wikipedia

If it's a duck, and there are no regular signs of sleepers, we don't need to invade privacy unnecessarily. -- Amanda (she/her) 01:41, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Fair, Template:Withdrawn. Template:Ping I have left a message on your talk page on a case which is irrelevant to this one; Thank you for taking your time to respond. --$\int$（☎） 01:50, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

(LWCU) JohnKessel2022, VLodge2, Patricka-1999

Template:Confirmed on LWCU as well, though nothing else of suspicion found. EPIC (talk) 11:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

TheoYalur@en.wikibooks

The user has clarified this, and hence the request is no longer needed. Leaderboard (talk) 11:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Läägpõrkur@et.wikipedia & meta

This is the request page for stewards. All data on et.wiki is likely stale, and we can't run checks on meta. -- Amanda (she/her) 00:07, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

As mentioned, the data on etwiki has expired so there is nothing to compare with anyone else there. And while in theory, I could do a check on Meta (as there is recent data here and I am a Meta CU), in practice, unless the socks have been recently active here on Meta (which is unclear as the socking was only on etwiki as far as I read), there would be no data to compare with here either. Thank you, closing as unactionable at the moment. EPIC (talk) 01:22, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Dxy5@zh.wikipedia

Both accounts are Template:Confirmed to each other as well as to Dxy5 based on data from the previous check. Metallikka is also Template:Confirmed to the group. EPIC (talk) 17:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

(LWCU) Doma101

Unfortunately both Samy bo7 and Youssefgamal70 are stale on loginwiki so there is no data to check. Anyways, if they are confirmed on frwiki then that should be enough, locked both accounts. EPIC (talk) 05:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

WhitePhosphorrous@zh.wikipedia

Accounts were checked at the time of locking, no sleepers except Oceanarch who is locked. Nothing else of suspicion found other than that. EPIC (talk) 05:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Ou1sdkle@zh.wikipedia

Template:CU request Template:Quote --Sotiale (talk) 06:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Travis Headache@hi.wikipedia

The data for Whois360 and Sabkhabarlive have both expired so there is nothing to compare with the others from them.

As for Balram4136 and Ayoudhayamahto I find the evidence of connection to Travis Headache too weak at the moment. The only thing I see is that Travis Headache reverted spam by them, and unless there is any evidence of them being self-reverts or so, the current evidence is not sufficient at the moment.

On the other hand I do agree that Travis Headache and Whois360 seem to be related, given the overlap between them as well as the fact that one was confirmed as a sock at enwiki, and the other is a suspected sock of the same user. But as mentioned, the data has expired for Whois360 so there is nothing to compare on that end. EPIC (talk) 07:15, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

馮克勁@yue.wikipedia

周樂為 is technically Template:Unlikely. The other four accounts are Template:Confirmed to each other. EPIC (talk) 07:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

BestHenry2024@hr.wikipedia

The data from all four accounts has expired so there is no data to compare from. With that said, BestHenry2024 is confirmed to previous socks through LWCU, so I locked the account now. EPIC (talk) 14:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Fipofi@az.wikipedia

Template:Duck. EPIC (talk) 10:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

@EPIC, no sleepers? Nemoralis (talk) 15:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Nope, no other related accounts than these three as far as I can see. EPIC (talk) 15:28, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Lazaro d'Aragón@an.wikipedia

Template:Doing, however the check will only focus on some of the accounts as some appear less clear. EPIC (talk) 10:24, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Template:Done (and courtesy ping Template:Ping). Lazaro d'Aragón, BCN63, ManelCiclista, Soportsforever, Máscineporfavor, 123Románico, MotownJazzSoul are all Template:Confirmed to each other. I also found another account, Manuel Trujillo Berges (with over 140,000 edits, so seems to be an old account of Lazaro d'Aragón), who is also technically Template:Confirmed to the other seven accounts.

JoelMLN is Template:Possible from a technical POV.

Rkt2312 is Template:Unrelated. EPIC (talk) 10:36, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Actually, after rechecking a little, I will raise the suspicion of JoelMLN from possible to Template:Possilikely, bordering towards likely. I see quite some overlap, though not enough for me to call it likely or confirmed. EPIC (talk) 10:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you User:EPIC. Now the many are confirmed I wonder if we/you should check Uno1o1o too. It is also a new user but they did not comment. I did not mention them to begin with because if the thin evidence. Sorry it makes it harder for you. So if you prefer not to check that’s okay too. --MGA73 (talk) 11:56, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

I checked and would call it Template:Possible. ISP is the same as one of the ones that the others were using (though it is a large ISP), and UA is also the same, but range is different. EPIC (talk) 12:27, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Da ch8@mediawikiwiki

Had a look, found both proxies and mobile ranges, as well as three other no edit accounts (so not sure whether they are also related).

Posted results on cuwiki, if you would like to view: [1] EPIC (talk) 19:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Mishsueeu2@zh.wikipedia

All three accounts Template:Confirmed to each other, along with Grrvyy and Cintrd56. EPIC (talk) 23:55, 28 September 2024 (UTC)